Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 783738" data-attributes="member: 12283">There is a fundamental flaw in the logic that Cobb is dispensable because he isn't the main focal point of the offense-- as though it's a binary choice. Cobb is not and won't be the main receiving target in this offense. But in his last three seasons with Rodgers, he's averaged 120 targets per 16 games played. That a large target share. And while it may go down, it likely won't dip below 100. That's an important role and, despite not being the most important, not one that can be casually dismissed.If he's moved in the efforts to acquire a player (e.g. Mack) whose positive impact is far greater than the negative impact of losing Cobb, then great. But to move him for a late round pick, or to simply cut him, makes no sense at all. He's an ideal player to keep on the roster this year as he provides a bridge of experience to all the youth at the position.</blockquote>

Total: 68 (members: 1, guests: 67)

S
Good Bye J’aire Alexander
- Latest: Schultz
- Yesterday at 5:13 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Nearly Perfect Draft...
- Latest: Schultz
- Yesterday at 4:40 PM
Draft Talk
New Proposed Kick-Off Rule
- Latest: El Guapo
- Yesterday at 4:34 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Your Do Not Draft List
- Latest: Thirteen Below
- Yesterday at 4:07 PM
Draft Talk
2025 Draft Media Stuff
- Latest: tynimiller
- Yesterday at 2:28 PM
Draft Talk