Clay’s groin

azrsx05

Cheesehead
Joined
Jan 11, 2011
Messages
610
Reaction score
77
The only reason he has a job is because that contract Teddy gave him. Similar to how Cutler held the Bears hostage. Also Teddys inability to a dress that position. Clay would maybe go play to another team for like 1-2 Mil.

I knew once NFL started testing for HGH he would start to decline
 
OP
OP
Mike McCarthy

Mike McCarthy

Cheesehead
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
632
Reaction score
55
Location
The Deep South
The only reason he has a job is because that contract Teddy gave him. Similar to how Cutler held the Bears hostage. Also Teddys inability to a dress that position. Clay would maybe go play to another team for like 1-2 Mil.

I knew once NFL started testing for HGH he would start to decline
Right, we have been holding on to clay and his gimpy body parts for years because “we have nobody else”, geez maybe it’s time to find somebody else. :geek:
 
H

HardRightEdge

Guest
they've tried. the newest contestant is beigle. before that datone the tweener bust. clay just keeps on going.
Lest we not forget The Incredible Shrinking Neal and there's Kyler Failure. At least Jones and Neal could be trusted on run downs.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Croak

Vincit qui patitur
Moderator
Joined
Aug 15, 2010
Messages
6,478
Reaction score
1,154
Location
New Cumberland, PA
I'm still shaking my head that we have an actual thread named after someone's "groin". :speechless: But the thread comments are interesting nonetheless.
 

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
33,655
Reaction score
8,901
Location
Madison, WI
I'm still shaking my head that we have an actual thread named after someone's "groin". :speechless: But the thread comments are interesting nonetheless.

I was half expecting you to let out a "big groin" over the thread name. :coffee:
 

Veretax

Cheesehead
Joined
Feb 4, 2008
Messages
637
Reaction score
11
Seriously... would the Packers be better off Trading Clay somewhere now (maybe the Browns?)

What is our solution at that position if its not Clay?
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
15,896
Reaction score
6,820
Seriously... would the Packers be better off Trading Clay somewhere now (maybe the Browns?)

What is our solution at that position if its not Clay?
Paying him what he’s worth. Although that sounded sarcastic Im being entirely serious here.
Also depending on who gets picked by #13 we likely should consider investing in his successor before we call him “Gray Beard II”
 

Half Empty

Cheesehead
Joined
Oct 29, 2014
Messages
4,548
Reaction score
659
Seriously... would the Packers be better off Trading Clay somewhere now (maybe the Browns?)

What is our solution at that position if its not Clay?

As always, if we don't want him for $11+ mil, why would the Browns, or anyone else?
 

GleefulGary

Cheesehead
Joined
Sep 9, 2017
Messages
5,014
Reaction score
507
The only reason he has a job is because that contract Teddy gave him. Similar to how Cutler held the Bears hostage. Also Teddys inability to a dress that position. Clay would maybe go play to another team for like 1-2 Mil.

I knew once NFL started testing for HGH he would start to decline

You seriously think a player if Clay Matthew's caliber can go play somewhere for $2 million a year? Serious?!

I get that the last couple years, Clay has been a disappointment, especially considering his contract. He's also played out of position, and busted his *** when available. He's not a bum.

In general with edge players in FA, you're paying $1-2M per sack. That's just what the market is. It might go down a little bit with players who are older. So please do realize that Clay isn't going to be playing anywhere for $2 million a year. Even Julius Peppers, at 37 years old, signed basically a $4M/year contract (side note: what a freak he is. I hate you Dom Capers, I hate you).
 

azrsx05

Cheesehead
Joined
Jan 11, 2011
Messages
610
Reaction score
77
You seriously think a player if Clay Matthew's caliber can go play somewhere for $2 million a year? Serious?!

I get that the last couple years, Clay has been a disappointment, especially considering his contract. He's also played out of position, and busted his *** when available. He's not a bum.

In general with edge players in FA, you're paying $1-2M per sack. That's just what the market is. It might go down a little bit with players who are older. So please do realize that Clay isn't going to be playing anywhere for $2 million a year. Even Julius Peppers, at 37 years old, signed basically a $4M/year contract (side note: what a freak he is. I hate you Dom Capers, I hate you).


What caliber? He has been ineffective. He takes plays off,he does maybe 1-3 plays where he actually hustles a game . I think we are over valuing him be sure he's a Packer, but I'm willing to bet many teams would actually be interested if he hits the market.

He was good until they started testing for HGH.
 

GleefulGary

Cheesehead
Joined
Sep 9, 2017
Messages
5,014
Reaction score
507
What caliber? He has been ineffective. He takes plays off,he does maybe 1-3 plays where he actually hustles a game . I think we are over valuing him be sure he's a Packer, but I'm willing to bet many teams would actually be interested if he hits the market.

He was good until they started testing for HGH.

3 plays a game max, where he hustles? You aren't watching the games. No way in hell anybody could seriously say that.

He was busting his *** in the last game of a season that didn't matter.

I think you need to re-watch the tape and take your bias out.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
15,896
Reaction score
6,820
Keep clay. Just trade his groin.
Perfect. Just for fun. I’m going to tell his agent to ask him before we make him a short term offer..
“Would he be willing to restructure his groin first?”
Love,

Glute... I mean Gute

I literally would demand an answer. Show him who’s boss. Then we can talk business! Lol
 
Last edited:

hallzi43

Cheesehead
Joined
Mar 5, 2018
Messages
435
Reaction score
18
they've tried. the newest contestant is beigle. before that datone the tweener bust. clay just keeps on going.

Trying would have been drafting TJ Watt. Biegel is just a pawn who will be a low end backer for us this season.
 

hallzi43

Cheesehead
Joined
Mar 5, 2018
Messages
435
Reaction score
18
Alec Ogletree and a 7th was traded today to the New York Giants for a 4th and a 6th round draft pick. That is the compensation you would be expecting if you were to trade Clay Matthews fwiw.
 
D

Deleted member 6794

Guest
Seriously... would the Packers be better off Trading Clay somewhere now (maybe the Browns?)

What is our solution at that position if its not Clay?

The Packers definitely have to upgrade their pass rush this offseason no matter if they hold on to Matthews or release him. It would be more difficult to improve the position without Clay though.

As a side note there's no way any other team trades for him at this point.

Alec Ogletree and a 7th was traded today to the New York Giants for a 4th and a 6th round draft pick. That is the compensation you would be expecting if you were to trade Clay Matthews fwiw.

I don't believe the Rams trading Ogletree to the Giants sets the bar for the compensation the Packers would receive for Matthews as they play different positions.

Once again, I guess other teams would give up a decent draft pick for Clay if he wouldn't be set to earn more than $10 million for next season with his contract expiring after 2018.
 

hallzi43

Cheesehead
Joined
Mar 5, 2018
Messages
435
Reaction score
18
I don't believe the Rams trading Ogletree to the Giants sets the bar for the compensation the Packers would receive for Matthews as they play different positions.

Once again, I guess other teams would give up a decent draft pick for Clay if he wouldn't be set to earn more than $10 million for next season with his contract expiring after 2018.

I don't think you would expect much more compensation than that. Ogletree is younger as well.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top