So, it is not even sure with a top-10 pick to get a starting OLineMan, but at 23?! I can see Bulaga in some very special circumstances becoming a starter at 23, but there's not at all a guarantee for that. I think Brown, and oh yeah he got tons of upside and btw. does a terrific job on screen passes(we like 'em a lot), 'cause of his athleticism. And Brown, admiteddly I'm on his bandwaggon a 'lil bit, improved a heckuva lot during the season, and USC-Ohio State was in September.
But anyway: if Bulaga isn't available at #23, I feel not to familiar with an OT there.(Gotta consider a downtrade(TT who?) or a BPA-Pick)
Actually, after further review, I think Charles Brown COULD be an instant upgrade in our OL. Given the way he progressed at USC, if he's able to gain 20 pounds, and if he can mantain his frame, he'll make our OL better.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AheRQNNgK64]YouTube - LT Charles Brown Highlights/Lowlights 2009 USC[/ame]
As I've said, he plays a little bit high, and isn't a nasty punisher, but his hands and feet are just terrific... Plus, he already knows the ZBS, he's better than I remembered at finding his man in the running game (though still needs a lot of work in there)
I'd be thrilled if we took him, and I believe he can be the CM3 of the 2010; a player that wasn't ready in college, but progressed each year, and wasn't projected to start, but ended up making a HUGE contribution to the team.
-
About Bulaga, it's my concept, and of a lot packer bloggers and scouts, that he's just ordinary. He is more ready than the other OL, but his upside is low, he's not athletic nor strong enough to be an elite LT in the pros, and his hands are average. His technique is very good, and he's nasty in the running game, though.