Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 957985" data-attributes="member: 10086">Well it’s not always that simple.Such as If we had an option to get Garrett Wilson with 22, 92.  I’d take that trade.While I understand losing a Day 2 selection seems harsh (and on surface I’d agree). Because it’s not a dead end. we can perfect other trades to recoup that 3rd if we wanted. Such as moving back from 28 into early round 2Meaning It eventually comes down to is that player worth the value of those combined selections.At 17-18 valued selection overall is Garrett worth it? Yes that’s a bargain imo. In reality, He’s probably gone by Washington’s pick but stranger things have happened. Aaron Rodgers should’ve never skipped past teens.Like you though. I’d prefer we trade up only that far max (17-18) and really think we should just stay easy and steady.No stupid reaches.Id really like to trust the draft to come to us.. we’ve plenty firepower and shouldn’t flinch. Unless there’s a player we have Pegged in just stupid slippage.   Karlaftis at a 26 trade up absolutely.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 91 (members: 0, guests: 91)

S
Good Bye J’aire Alexander
- Latest: Schultz
- Yesterday at 5:13 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Nearly Perfect Draft...
- Latest: Schultz
- Yesterday at 4:40 PM
Draft Talk
New Proposed Kick-Off Rule
- Latest: El Guapo
- Yesterday at 4:34 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Your Do Not Draft List
- Latest: Thirteen Below
- Yesterday at 4:07 PM
Draft Talk
2025 Draft Media Stuff
- Latest: tynimiller
- Yesterday at 2:28 PM
Draft Talk