Scotland Yard, I commend you for your bold prediction on
Feb 1st 2016. Had I seen your thread back in February, I too would've reacted pretty negatively towards those predictions. I am pretty sure I wouldn't have attacked you though.
I couldn't have imagined Sitton going, but this was well before drafting Spriggs & Murphy. I still couldn't have imagined Sitton or possibly Lang going after the Draft.
Do I agree with the move....
sorta.
Sitton positives, great guard, veteran, consistently showed up, and leader amongst the group.
Sitton negatives, 30+ years old, salary, potential injury risk from past back issues, and potentially a tough signing in 2017.
With that in mind, I can
understand the move from Ted to use age/health as the deciding factor to this and apply what is gained from the Sitton's release to the 2nd most important position in football...The Left Tackle.
Ted isn't a fan, he's a GM, he can't let the fandom of a player play a part in his decision process. It's up to him, to do think about the team's present and future as equals. As much as it sucks for us to watch these things happen, ultimately we are still watching a darn good football team and
all the credit goes to TED, for the reasons why.
Ted does have a history of letting guys go after they have peaked (Wells, Dietrich-Smith, Hayward, House,
Favre, Peprah, Neal, Bishop, Walden, Babre, KUHN, Jennings, Jones, etc), except for AJ Hawk & Brad Jones. Those two stuck around a little too long to their benefit, not the Packers.
So, this is my
official pat-on-the-back to
Scotland Yard
I get wordy sometimes in my replies, apologies