tynimiller
Cheesehead
- Joined
- May 2, 2012
- Messages
- 14,958
- Reaction score
- 5,592
Man...lot of takes posted here, shared through the news and radio the last 24 hours.
In all honesty I think the majority of the Packer fans realize and know either projection from either extreme is just lying to themselves, that would be:
"We're are a much better team without Davante Adams on the roster, just look at the record without him."
&
"We have zero chance at a Super Bowl now without Davante, none."
Breathe everyone for a second.
Even as someone that kinda felt and predicted this weeks ago when we placed the tag and then it was known Davante wasn't happy...that doesn't mean I am happy he is gone. Davante was a rare breed of WR that go straight to the HOF once they decide to retire. Those don't happen often and even over the thirty years with Favre and Rodgers, none compare to what DA could do IMO - none.
That all said, we can still win without him...and yes the track history is there but as @captainWIMM and I have discussed about that record - it is unexplainable in many ways. You shouldn't be able to be that good without your best offensive weapon (outside the QB) not in the game. However, all that said, we do have Aaron "freaking baaaaaad man" Rodgers, and that my friends is saying a LOT. This is the man that made Jarrett Boykin look like an NFL WR one year...made MVS out of high school with one route ability produce like a three year #3...this man won games with Janis as the first option....he spins it better than anyone and that is something I will never bet against completely.
Fact of the matter is not a single FA or draft pick can replace Davante, however what MLF and Gute have to do is add multiple pieces to the offense for Rodgers to be that incredibly deadly QB he can be.
Lot of time for this all to shuffle out...do we trade one of our four top 60 picks for a WR...do we also or only add a veteran in FA before the draft...do we do one of each of those....do we double dip with two WRs in the top 60 draft picks?
In all honesty I think the majority of the Packer fans realize and know either projection from either extreme is just lying to themselves, that would be:
"We're are a much better team without Davante Adams on the roster, just look at the record without him."
&
"We have zero chance at a Super Bowl now without Davante, none."
Breathe everyone for a second.
Even as someone that kinda felt and predicted this weeks ago when we placed the tag and then it was known Davante wasn't happy...that doesn't mean I am happy he is gone. Davante was a rare breed of WR that go straight to the HOF once they decide to retire. Those don't happen often and even over the thirty years with Favre and Rodgers, none compare to what DA could do IMO - none.
That all said, we can still win without him...and yes the track history is there but as @captainWIMM and I have discussed about that record - it is unexplainable in many ways. You shouldn't be able to be that good without your best offensive weapon (outside the QB) not in the game. However, all that said, we do have Aaron "freaking baaaaaad man" Rodgers, and that my friends is saying a LOT. This is the man that made Jarrett Boykin look like an NFL WR one year...made MVS out of high school with one route ability produce like a three year #3...this man won games with Janis as the first option....he spins it better than anyone and that is something I will never bet against completely.
Fact of the matter is not a single FA or draft pick can replace Davante, however what MLF and Gute have to do is add multiple pieces to the offense for Rodgers to be that incredibly deadly QB he can be.
Lot of time for this all to shuffle out...do we trade one of our four top 60 picks for a WR...do we also or only add a veteran in FA before the draft...do we do one of each of those....do we double dip with two WRs in the top 60 draft picks?