Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2013 needs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 476605"><p>If you equate "best player available" to TT's practices, then I'd qualify your first statement by saying "best player available" doesn't <strong>necessarily</strong> mean best player available. He might be, he might not.</p><p> </p><p>Check out the Jersey Al link in Reply 55 in this thread. Maybe somebody else's words making the same points might resonate.</p><p> </p><p>Let's say TT is picking at #30 in the next draft, his tier 2 covers #11 - #25 value guys, and the only player left on the board from tier 1 and tier 2 happens to be a tier 2 QB. TT would skip over the QB and look to his tier 3 list or try to trade down. In that case, he is not taking the best available player because he has no need for a first round QB who will sit on the bench for 4 years getting paid first round money, and then going FA. That's an obvious example, but there are certainly similar situations with a little more nuance that are bound to arise.</p><p> </p><p>Most GMs will look at it this way, with one variation or another. What separates them is (1) accurately assessing their needs, (2) valuing players, (3) the willingness and agility to trade and (4) time horizon. Points (1) and (2) are closely linked. If a GM is a poor talent evaluator he also may not accurately evaluate his needs.</p><p> </p><p>Point (4) is where teams most frequently screw up. For example, Holmgren had a one year time horizon to keep his job, so Weeden was the best available player giving him a chance to keep from getting fired. It didn't work, but nothing ventured, nothing gained.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 476605"] If you equate "best player available" to TT's practices, then I'd qualify your first statement by saying "best player available" doesn't [B]necessarily[/B] mean best player available. He might be, he might not. Check out the Jersey Al link in Reply 55 in this thread. Maybe somebody else's words making the same points might resonate. Let's say TT is picking at #30 in the next draft, his tier 2 covers #11 - #25 value guys, and the only player left on the board from tier 1 and tier 2 happens to be a tier 2 QB. TT would skip over the QB and look to his tier 3 list or try to trade down. In that case, he is not taking the best available player because he has no need for a first round QB who will sit on the bench for 4 years getting paid first round money, and then going FA. That's an obvious example, but there are certainly similar situations with a little more nuance that are bound to arise. Most GMs will look at it this way, with one variation or another. What separates them is (1) accurately assessing their needs, (2) valuing players, (3) the willingness and agility to trade and (4) time horizon. Points (1) and (2) are closely linked. If a GM is a poor talent evaluator he also may not accurately evaluate his needs. Point (4) is where teams most frequently screw up. For example, Holmgren had a one year time horizon to keep his job, so Weeden was the best available player giving him a chance to keep from getting fired. It didn't work, but nothing ventured, nothing gained. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
S
Good Bye J’aire Alexander
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 5:13 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Nearly Perfect Draft...
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 4:40 PM
Draft Talk
New Proposed Kick-Off Rule
Latest: El Guapo
Yesterday at 4:34 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Your Do Not Draft List
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 4:07 PM
Draft Talk
2025 Draft Media Stuff
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 2:28 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2013 needs
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
