New Proposed Kick-Off Rule

GBkrzygrl

Cheesehead
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
771
Reaction score
240
I think I understand in general what they are proposing regarding the kick-offs. I haven't decided what I think about that yet. But with the idea of notifying the other team when you are doing an onside kick...I don't understand how that is supposed to be helpful. I'm not crazy about it. Wasn't the point that it is supposed to be a surprise? I don't recall many players being hurt on that play.

Thoughts?
 

gopkrs

Cheesehead
Joined
May 12, 2014
Messages
5,404
Reaction score
1,288
Yes, I agree. It should be part of the game. Why not go back to the old way?
 

Firethorn1001

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 20, 2015
Messages
1,562
Reaction score
1,107
They won't go back to the old way because they were pounding the table it was for player safety so, you go back and people will say the NFL doesn't care about player safety.

At this point, if they aren't going back to the way it was just scrap it and go to some type of '4th and X' play at the 25. Pick a percent you want to be successful (10%) and then find out historically in the last 5 years or so what 3rd/4th distance for a 1st down matches that percent. If historically only 10% of 3rd or 4th and 20 get a 1st down, well.. then the team has 4th and 20 at the 25. Get a 1st and your 'onside kick' was successful and you continue on. No? Turnover on downs.

Better theater than this nonsensical 1% onside chance
 
Last edited:

sschind

Cheesehead
Joined
Oct 5, 2014
Messages
5,026
Reaction score
1,288
They won't go back to the old way because they were pounding the table it was for player safety so, you go back and people will say the NFL doesn't care about player safety.

At this point, if they aren't going back to the way it was just scrap it and go to some type of '4th and X' play at the 25. Pick a percent you want to be successful (10%) and then find out historically in the last 5 years or so what 3rd/4th distance for a 1st down matches that percent. If historically only 10% of 3rd or 4th and 20 get a 1st down, well.. then the team has 4th and 20 at the 30. Get a 1st and your 'onside kick' was successful and you continue on. No? Turnover on downs.

Better theater than this nonsensical 1% onside chance
Just a couple of questions about your idea.

You have a 4th and 20 situation at the 30. Meaning you have to reach midfield to continue. Say the pass was incomplete or short of midfield. Where does the defending team get the ball?

Say your play gets you to the 25 or even a TD. Does that play stand? Or do you get the ball 1st and 10 at the 50. If the former I can see more teams going for it as it essentially adds an offensive play.
 

Firethorn1001

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 20, 2015
Messages
1,562
Reaction score
1,107
You have a 4th and 20 situation at the 30. Meaning you have to reach midfield to continue. Say the pass was incomplete or short of midfield. Where does the defending team get the ball?

Say your play gets you to the 25 or even a TD. Does that play stand? Or do you get the ball 1st and 10 at the 50. If the former I can see more teams going for it as it essentially adds an offensive play.

If I was the rules god..

1. Defending team would get the ball wherever it ends up. Same as for an onside kick.

2. Given you can't advance the ball on an onside kick, I'd say put the ball back to the 'recovery' point which would either be the point of the 1st down or where the receiver caught the ball. So effectively only way to score a TD is to chuck it to where the receiver would be standing in the end zone or the defense gets a turnover then subsequently fumbles and the offense scoops and scores.
 

Schultz

Cheesehead
Joined
Mar 8, 2021
Messages
2,843
Reaction score
1,626
IMO this could somewhat explain the previously unexplainable contract that the Pack gave Nixon.
 

PikeBadger

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jan 19, 2013
Messages
6,475
Reaction score
1,808
Teams must have optimism on the new KO rule. Steelers just signed Cordarrelle Patterson to a 2yr deal
I think this rule is part of the reason Nixon scored so well in free agency. Packers management knew this rule was coming to the table and the reasons why.
 

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
32,440
Reaction score
8,088
Location
Madison, WI
I'm still getting up to speed on the new kickoff rules. I have attached a link to the new rules below.

If onside kicks were difficult to recover under the "old-new" rules, these New rules make it almost impossible. It will be interesting to watch what teams do to try and accomplish a successful onside kick recovery.

Kickers with really good accuracy are going to be coveted with this new system. Returners with the ability to track balls and get a bit of a running start, while still fielding the ball in the air cleanly, will also be coveted.

You must be logged in to see this image or video!

 

Poppa San

* Team Owner *
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Messages
12,916
Reaction score
2,793
Location
20 miles from Lambeau
Just watch some of the UFL games. I've seen no big returns. There have been zero returns for TDs. I think people are expecting too much from the return game.
RkNameTeamGPNo.YdsTDLong
1Juwan Manigo
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Arlington Renegades
523501045
2Chris Rowland
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
DC Defenders
519475057
3Darrius Shepherd
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
St. Louis Battlehawks
416462060
4Isiah Hennie
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Houston Roughnecks
410324075
5Trey Williams
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Memphis Showboats
311290035
6Titus Swen
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Memphis Showboats
511285037
7Brycen Alleyne
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
San Antonio Brahmas
512271042
8Anthony Ratliff-Williams
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Houston Roughnecks
410237033
9Deon Cain
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Birmingham Stallions
510204039
10Levonta Taylor
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Michigan Panthers
58200034
 

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
32,440
Reaction score
8,088
Location
Madison, WI
Just watch some of the UFL games. I've seen no big returns. There have been zero returns for TDs. I think people are expecting too much from the return game.
RkNameTeamGPNo.YdsTDLong
1Juwan Manigo
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Arlington Renegades
523501045
2Chris Rowland
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
DC Defenders
519475057
3Darrius Shepherd
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
St. Louis Battlehawks
416462060
4Isiah Hennie
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Houston Roughnecks
410324075
5Trey Williams
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Memphis Showboats
311290035
6Titus Swen
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Memphis Showboats
511285037
7Brycen Alleyne
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
San Antonio Brahmas
512271042
8Anthony Ratliff-Williams
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Houston Roughnecks
410237033
9Deon Cain
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Birmingham Stallions
510204039
10Levonta Taylor
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Michigan Panthers
58200034

Who's this Darrius Sheppard guy? He looks good. :coffee: ;)


Why not do away with Kickoffs all together and instead, have the "kicking team" punt the ball from their own 30, with standard punting rules in place? Instead of "on-side kicks", a team could get possession of the ball by converting a fake punt into say a 15 yard gain (45 yard line or beyond). Sure, if you bring your starting offense out for a "kick off" odds are, you are "going for it."
 

Poppa San

* Team Owner *
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Messages
12,916
Reaction score
2,793
Location
20 miles from Lambeau
Who's this Darrius Sheppard guy? He looks good. :coffee: ;)


Why not do away with Kickoffs all together and instead, have the "kicking team" punt the ball from their own 30, with standard punting rules in place? Instead of "on-side kicks", a team could get possession of the ball by converting a fake punt into say a 15 yard gain (45 yard line or beyond). Sure, if you bring your starting offense out for a "kick off" odds are, you are "going for it."
I like the 4th and 25 scenario from the 40.
 

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
32,440
Reaction score
8,088
Location
Madison, WI
I like the 4th and 25 scenario from the 40.
The reason I am not a fan of a "staged onside kick", is that it takes the element of surprise away. As I said with my punting scenario, running your starting team in, might take that surprise away, but it doesn't mean you still won't punt the ball. If you bring your punt team in and decide to fake it, that would be a surprise. Teams would be able to open the game or half off with it, as well as at anytime during the game.
 
Top