Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Your ideal WR target
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Calvin" data-source="post: 863161" data-attributes="member: 14280"><p><strong>The question of this thread is what is your ideal receiver to get.</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p>This means people are going to give their opinion of what they think. If you read my original post. I said I want GB to stop bringing in 6'2"-6'5" tall WRs. I want GB to get a smaller receiver who is fast. That is my opinion. I happened to mention John Ross, that is my opinion.</p><p></p><p>What is the problem? One poster in particular just took the portion about me wanting a 4.3 receiver and ran with it.</p><p></p><p>I want GB to bring in a receiver 6 feet or under , ideally who can run a 4.3, what the heck is wrong with that?</p><p></p><p>If GB drafts a 6'6" WR runs a 4.9, and he gains 1500yds, I'll be happy. I'm just giving my opinion of what i want to see.</p><p></p><p>To answer your question, none of our tall WRs are working out. Outside of Adam, maybe Lazard, everyone else can easily be replaced, can't get any worst.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Calvin, post: 863161, member: 14280"] [B]The question of this thread is what is your ideal receiver to get.[/B] This means people are going to give their opinion of what they think. If you read my original post. I said I want GB to stop bringing in 6'2"-6'5" tall WRs. I want GB to get a smaller receiver who is fast. That is my opinion. I happened to mention John Ross, that is my opinion. What is the problem? One poster in particular just took the portion about me wanting a 4.3 receiver and ran with it. I want GB to bring in a receiver 6 feet or under , ideally who can run a 4.3, what the heck is wrong with that? If GB drafts a 6'6" WR runs a 4.9, and he gains 1500yds, I'll be happy. I'm just giving my opinion of what i want to see. To answer your question, none of our tall WRs are working out. Outside of Adam, maybe Lazard, everyone else can easily be replaced, can't get any worst. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Top 30 Visits 2025
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 10:54 PM
Draft Talk
The 80th Annual Amish Mafia Draft Contest
Latest: Todd Princl
Yesterday at 10:38 PM
Draft Talk
R
Dome over Lambeau?
Latest: rmontro
Yesterday at 10:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 Draft Clusters
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 9:26 PM
Draft Talk
Your Do Not Draft List
Latest: Dantés
Yesterday at 9:20 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Your ideal WR target
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top