Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 723125">This is an extremely weak argument against PFF as no media outlet has access to that information. Yet several posters around here feel knowledgeable enough to make a credible evaluation about prospects based on highlight films.Thompson trading back indicates that there were several prospects available the Packers liked but doesn't mean need didn't factor in any of the selections.You're right, I'm sorry about being pissy. It seems a lot of other draftniks agree that Jones is more talented than PFF has graded him and I should have taken that into consideration. I truly hope they are right about him and he turns into a stud.While Peters made a lot of plays on the ball during his rookie season he allowed the second most receiving yards that year as well.I have posted it on several occasions that I believe overall Thompson has done a great job over his tenure with the Packers and that I don't consider him a bad general manager by any means. Other than you I don't agree with every single move he makes though resulting in you putting me in the TT hater group for whatever reason. The Packers having spent their first selection on defense over the last six years as well as their first four picks on that side of the ball this time around is a pretty strong indicator that position of need is a huge factor in making a selection.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 43 (members: 0, guests: 43)