Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Would Aaron Rodgers be a better choice in 2006 ANYWAY?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="route25" data-source="post: 61552" data-attributes="member: 485"><p>I agree that the OL was not as bad last year as people say. Early in the year we had an unproductive Ahman Green at running back. He looked really slow to me. Late in the year, after Gado got hurt, we had Fisher and Herron at running back. In between with Davenport(for 1 game) and Gado, the running game wasn't bad. In the 7 games in which Davenport and Gado were the primary ball carrier, the Packers averaged 117 yards rushing per game. They averaged 72 in the other 9 games. If the Packers had averaged 117 YPG for the whole season, they would have finished a respectable 13th in the NFL in rushing.</p><p></p><p>One of the reasons why Favre's stance frustrates me is because he fails to recognize that things will likely improve this season just because guys are healthy. There is little reason to think the Packers' running game won't at least be respectable.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="route25, post: 61552, member: 485"] I agree that the OL was not as bad last year as people say. Early in the year we had an unproductive Ahman Green at running back. He looked really slow to me. Late in the year, after Gado got hurt, we had Fisher and Herron at running back. In between with Davenport(for 1 game) and Gado, the running game wasn't bad. In the 7 games in which Davenport and Gado were the primary ball carrier, the Packers averaged 117 yards rushing per game. They averaged 72 in the other 9 games. If the Packers had averaged 117 YPG for the whole season, they would have finished a respectable 13th in the NFL in rushing. One of the reasons why Favre's stance frustrates me is because he fails to recognize that things will likely improve this season just because guys are healthy. There is little reason to think the Packers' running game won't at least be respectable. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
SudsMcBucky
Latest posts
H
Good Bye J’aire Alexander
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 8:04 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Brewers 2025!
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 7:45 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
2025 Draft in Green Bay
Latest: PikeBadger
Today at 7:37 AM
Draft Talk
New Proposed Kick-Off Rule
Latest: Curly Calhoun
Today at 6:31 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Push to Ban the **** Push
Latest: Curly Calhoun
Today at 6:29 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Would Aaron Rodgers be a better choice in 2006 ANYWAY?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top