Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 980274" data-attributes="member: 10086">Oh it’s ok. I sorta see both sides on that issue.  In general I agree he would’ve not need to concern himself coming in early (OTA).On the flip side I see it as situational.  If you’ve got a complete Roster changeover, which we did, I’d lean towards getting in there to show some leadership. I know it’s not required, but that’s that whole idea behind leadership is doing things above and beyond. Especially after the recent history of some abrasive relations and then a full commitment towards him with a fully guaranteed, record breaker.Am I going to lose sleep over it? NoWill it occasionally be a talking point in in regard to his commitment? Yes Just because we wanted him there doesn’t imply we don’t like him or are going to extract a “pound of flesh” for his absence. He’s a terrific player. He’s not playing like he’s capable though either. We both know we’ve got a lot more problems team-wide than just getting that sector on the same wavelength.</blockquote>

Total: 323 (members: 1, guests: 322)