Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 978268" data-attributes="member: 10086">I mean It’s ok. There’s 2 schools of thought here.One is we’ve got a newer stable of Receivers and a massive new Reord breaking $ commitment, including some QB say on player acquisitions that affect his Offense. All these changes require maximum effort on all parties to gel. Several WR showed that commitment as an example Romeo Doubs was a good example of said commitmentThe second school was business as usual. #12 will compensate for everyone else’s shortcomings, after all he’s back to back MVP.  What could he or anyone else possibly benefit. It’s more or less a waste of time. Personally I don’t care about other teams, their scenarios at WR were a far cry from ours. Also had #12 made 1 group text every WR on that team would’ve showed up. Those other guys got wind that it’s not important because their Captain said so. I believe level of commitment is silent but obvious. In this case obviously the Packers don’t need the extra 10 days…right?  NOT!!</blockquote>

Total: 112 (members: 3, guests: 109)