Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="PackAttack12" data-source="post: 737515" data-attributes="member: 11933">You couldn't be more off base on that comment.We're basing our opinions on the past Green Bay Packers defensive performance. All last night did was confirm our skepticism about this defense. It's much more plausible to base an opinion off of games and seasons worth of data, as opposed to one game.This secondary is the exact same unit, plus House and rookies. It's no wonder that essentially the same Falcons team blew through essentially the same Packers team which played in this past year's NFC Championship game. Not to mention, House essentially replaced Micah Hyde so that's effectively a wash.If we don't see marked improvement from Randall and Rollins (not looking pretty right now) and/or breakout seasons from rookies, we're screwed in the secondary just like we were last year. Just like many, including myself, feared we would be dating back to the beginning of the offseason. The only hope would be for the defensive front to continue getting pressure on the quarterback, because this secondary is absolutely no better than it was last year.</blockquote>

Total: 112 (members: 3, guests: 109)

Badger Volleyball 2025-26
- Latest: Voyageur
- Today at 3:55 PM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
2025 Draft Clusters
- Latest: Dantés
- Today at 3:44 PM
Draft Talk
Top 30 Visits 2025
- Latest: DoURant
- Today at 3:38 PM
Draft Talk
S
A Packers Mock Draft
- Latest: Schultz
- Today at 12:39 PM
Draft Talk
R
Dome over Lambeau?
- Latest: rmontro
- Today at 3:47 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum