Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Week 4: Buffalo at Green Bay - Time to bounce back
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 791048"><p>I have no problem with Rodgers being dissatisfied with the offense's performance. While "perfect is the enemy of the good" has its place, if the objective is winning a Super Bowl (which should be the case) a very high level of performance should be the target. I'm OK if he's always dissatisfied up through the post-Super Bowl interview. There's always room for incremental improvement even after a "we played well" assessment.</p><p></p><p>So, that's not the problem. Laying it off on the play calling without taking any personal responsibility is the problem. Rodgers was clearly not his sharpest self in that game.</p><p></p><p>Rodgers said, to paraphrase, that he provides his ideas of what should go into a game plan but he doesn't create it. Given his complaints about the plan, this suggests he believes he was not sufficiently heard. Conversely, if he has it in the back of his mind, "this is not the play I want to run or the throw I want to make", performance will suffer. It's fairly evident that he thought the game plan and the calls were too conservative, particularly in the second half.</p><p></p><p>There needs to be a meeting of the minds. The conducter and the virtuoso performer need to find agreement on how to interpret the notes on the page, one way or the other.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 791048"] I have no problem with Rodgers being dissatisfied with the offense's performance. While "perfect is the enemy of the good" has its place, if the objective is winning a Super Bowl (which should be the case) a very high level of performance should be the target. I'm OK if he's always dissatisfied up through the post-Super Bowl interview. There's always room for incremental improvement even after a "we played well" assessment. So, that's not the problem. Laying it off on the play calling without taking any personal responsibility is the problem. Rodgers was clearly not his sharpest self in that game. Rodgers said, to paraphrase, that he provides his ideas of what should go into a game plan but he doesn't create it. Given his complaints about the plan, this suggests he believes he was not sufficiently heard. Conversely, if he has it in the back of his mind, "this is not the play I want to run or the throw I want to make", performance will suffer. It's fairly evident that he thought the game plan and the calls were too conservative, particularly in the second half. There needs to be a meeting of the minds. The conducter and the virtuoso performer need to find agreement on how to interpret the notes on the page, one way or the other. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Pkrjones
Latest posts
Dome over Lambeau?
Latest: Poppa San
24 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
G
2025 Draft in Green Bay
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
38 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Badger Volleyball 2025-26
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 3:55 PM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
2025 Draft Clusters
Latest: Dantés
Today at 3:44 PM
Draft Talk
Top 30 Visits 2025
Latest: DoURant
Today at 3:38 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Week 4: Buffalo at Green Bay - Time to bounce back
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top