Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AmishMafia" data-source="post: 869450" data-attributes="member: 2846">I dont know that I would describe him as playing poorly. I know he had some bad games but he also had some pretty good games.  He improved, as you stated, in year two, I dont see any reason he wont be even better next season. PFF rated him average at 64.5.  This is good for a raw 2nd year player.And by the way, Lancaster is the first player in my list above. He is slightly more athletic (testing) than Clark. Clark has him beat in non-testables, balance, assimilation, power quickness, reaction, etc.</blockquote>

Total: 95 (members: 5, guests: 90)