Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="McKnowledge" data-source="post: 989522" data-attributes="member: 11543">Think of it as a team having more control over the direction of their franchise.Buffalo has cycled through RBs and the results are hollow wins and tough losses. The RB is vital to Buffalo and depending on Allen to go Superman every game is not good football.If willing, Buffalo trades for Dillon, gets a full year of production and evaluation.They like what they see, they negotiate terms.They lack high end draft picks, and with Allen's extension kicking in, they cannot keep 2 big contracts for WRs.Flip side, Green Bay is not paying for 2 sizable deals going to Jones and Dillon.Bottom line, imagine yourself as a boss...Would you rather negotiate a deal with someone that is more favorable to the direction of your organization and doesn't pose a threat to the viability of other top producers?Or do you want to commit to someone that isn't an asset, won't produce consistently, and takes away snaps from a better player while taking a nice chunk of cap space?</blockquote>

Total: 105 (members: 3, guests: 102)

Badger Volleyball 2025-26
- Latest: Voyageur
- Today at 3:55 PM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
2025 Draft Clusters
- Latest: Dantés
- Today at 3:44 PM
Draft Talk
Top 30 Visits 2025
- Latest: DoURant
- Today at 3:38 PM
Draft Talk
S
A Packers Mock Draft
- Latest: Schultz
- Today at 12:39 PM
Draft Talk
R
Dome over Lambeau?
- Latest: rmontro
- Today at 3:47 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum