Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mondio" data-source="post: 976614" data-attributes="member: 10441">I guess I'm not too disappointed, same as I wouldn't have been too excited.  Sure everyone likes a shiny new toy so that would have been fun to talk about, but not sure what difference it would have made in the grand scheme of things.We're kind of in limbo and it feels weird.  I'm not surprised GB didn't send anybody to other teams.  You don't commit to your QB, Give big new contracts to Jaire, Rasul, Campbell, restructure BakhT and Preston etc to suddenly dismantle a team midseason when you're still in it and could actually be a player later if you clean up things you can definitely clean up.  Yes I wish they had "committed" more to getting weapons in here, but I'm not sure Claypool was the answer either. Yeah, he would have been nice and I think he would have helped, but enough?   I still say, until we clean up the interior of that Oline, running an offense is going to be difficult.  Though I admit having another weapon or 2 would have made things more interesting.  Hockensen would have been nice, I'd have done that trade.  He's a player I think is a sure thing going forward for years.  Oh well, I get to see progress in the young guys and cheer them on.  I hope they turned a corner last week, especially Doubs.  Really nice on those contested catches.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 159 (members: 0, guests: 159)