Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="adambr2" data-source="post: 976539" data-attributes="member: 7277">And the point is, if you couldn't keep Adams, trying to delay the rebuild and moving forward with Rodgers and a whole not of nothing around him was a very poor plan. This was the most poorly planned offseason that I can ever remember for the Packers. You have a QB who requires a great deal of time (sometimes years) and trust to develop with WRs but that can produce elite results once that connection is formed, like with Adams. They had 3 choices they could have made this off-season and I would have understood any of them:1) Dig your heels in on trading Adams until he caves and sticks around for one more year. Obviously, the risk here is that he never caves and holds out for the year.2) Go out and acquire a Tyreek Hill, AJB type receiver that can form an immediate connection with Rodgers.3) Trade Adams, trade Rodgers, try to accelerate the rebuild and see what you have in Love for '22. I would have understood any of these choices. They went with choice #4, do nothing for weapons, lose Adams and keep Rodgers anyway.</blockquote>

Total: 109 (members: 3, guests: 106)