Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Thoughts on the Packers taking Davis?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="spardo62" data-source="post: 64871" data-attributes="member: 516"><p>Lets face it , when you are coming off a 4-12 you need help everywhere, and by taking the BPA you are by default filling a need. With the lack of true impact players on this roster, any impact player, at any position would be a significant upgrade. I am just basing my preference for Davis over Hawk on the fact that I personally feel that Hawk has somewhat plateaued and while a solid prosepect, will not be an Urlacher/Lewis type of force at LB and there are solid LB's to be had in rounds 2,3 or later. I agree that TE is not our most glaring need, however neither Franks nor any of the other tight ends has proven to be a difference maker. But the presence of Davis could elevate their games, while also masking a somewhat thin WR corps. Although he would take heat, I would not be opposed to taking a QB at 5 either, if it is felt that this player is special and has great upside. Even though Favre might be back and we took QB 1st last year.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="spardo62, post: 64871, member: 516"] Lets face it , when you are coming off a 4-12 you need help everywhere, and by taking the BPA you are by default filling a need. With the lack of true impact players on this roster, any impact player, at any position would be a significant upgrade. I am just basing my preference for Davis over Hawk on the fact that I personally feel that Hawk has somewhat plateaued and while a solid prosepect, will not be an Urlacher/Lewis type of force at LB and there are solid LB's to be had in rounds 2,3 or later. I agree that TE is not our most glaring need, however neither Franks nor any of the other tight ends has proven to be a difference maker. But the presence of Davis could elevate their games, while also masking a somewhat thin WR corps. Although he would take heat, I would not be opposed to taking a QB at 5 either, if it is felt that this player is special and has great upside. Even though Favre might be back and we took QB 1st last year. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Good Bye J’aire Alexander
Latest: gopkrs
Yesterday at 7:45 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
How much time?
Latest: PackerDNA
Yesterday at 7:20 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Brewers 2025!
Latest: weeds
Yesterday at 6:45 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
First Round Prospect Discussions Specifically
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 6:32 PM
Draft Talk
Your Do Not Draft List
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 6:30 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Thoughts on the Packers taking Davis?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top