Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Schultz" data-source="post: 907752" data-attributes="member: 16827">You make good points so I will give my opinion on the draft. I truly believe that the people who do this for a living know more than I do. I also believe that forums like this is for people to share their opinions.Pre-draft- I was hoping for 1 trade up. I was thinking a 4&5 or 4&6 to move up in the 4th round or a 5 & 6 to move up in the 5th. I also believed we could address 1 more position in FA after the draft. Based on needs I was hoping the 1st 3 picks would de a OT-CB & DE. I would have gone with the right ILB or WR and pushed those needs back a spot thus the need for the trade up. The middle 3 picks I felt WR-OL-DB if we had not already taken a WR. The last 3 picks DT-RB- then another WR/KR if we did not draft 2 WRs yet and neither was a KR. Otherwise I would have gone TE. If an ILB was not taken in the first 3 rounds the rest were off my list. Now there is no way a board falls the way you want thus the need for the FA where things did not work out.What actually happened. The 1st 3 picks were CB-OL-WR. No complaints. Were they the 3 guys I would have taken, or in the order I would have taken them? No, but as explained in the opening I trust an NFL FO over my opinion. The trade up did happen. The middle 3 picks were OL-DT-CB. My only issue here is I would have rather had a DE than a DT. Maybe they solve this in FA. The final 3 picks went OL-ILB-RB. I thought the 3rd OL was to make sure they got someone who could play Tackle. After reading that they probably drafted a C & 2 Gs I am disappointed in this pick. Not the player but the position. As stated I did not want a late round ILB but since the WR they got also returns punts if this is a good ST pick I trust the pros. They then got a RB that I cannot believe was still there at 256. So without using any players names or stating who I (a fan) thinks is better than the guys who get paid to do this think my only concerns are that OT until Bahk gets back may be an issue and they still need another DE in my opinion.</blockquote>

Verification

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 105 (members: 0, guests: 105)

Latest posts

R
Dome over Lambeau?
- Latest: rmontro
- Today at 1:14 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 NFL Free Agency
- Latest: DoURant
- Yesterday at 11:20 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
2025 Draft Media Stuff
- Latest: Schultz
- Yesterday at 10:40 PM
Draft Talk
S
First Round Prospect Discussions Specifically
- Latest: Schultz
- Yesterday at 9:08 PM
Draft Talk
The 80th Annual Amish Mafia Draft Contest
- Latest: AmishMafia
- Yesterday at 8:23 PM
Draft Talk