Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mondio" data-source="post: 877765" data-attributes="member: 10441">I think that is short changing it a bit.  True, you needed better than dog crap at positions, but most of those guys were good, but weren’t stellar athletes who just couldn’t be guarded.there are receivers all over the nfl with the same attributes our “stars” have had.  I think there was a requirement of having decent athletes, like any offense, but it also requires cerebral athletes.when they knew the offense it did create opportunities because they knew how to beat the guy within the scheme either by communicating with the QB, moving his alignment, or reading the defense correctly and running the correct route.it doesn’t work well when you dont have smart athletes and time to get it all down.It has definite draw backs.  But then schemes get figured out all the time, and then what?  You better have good athletes.  When Gurley wasn’t setting everything up, what did the rams become?  Every offense or scheme has its drawbacks.</blockquote>

Total: 109 (members: 3, guests: 106)