Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1000570" data-attributes="member: 10086">Sure. I agree Tee Higgins is superior to Lazard in that general sense.I also agree in what you said in bold. We needed more than Tee Higgins to bring us to the promise land. That’s what the argument is he’s trying to make. That Tee Higgins was the answer to all our Defensive and ST woes. I don’t believe that part. I’m not here to beat up on Tee Higgins he’s a fine player. Although imo Higgins might’ve even had slightly less yards with Rodgers over the last 3 seasons than he did with Burrow. Thus the divide is relatively small. We’re talking 15 yards a game area small.Btw. I chose 2022 because it was a year that WR (Higgins and Lazard) BOTH had legitimate chances of breaking out as a true “WR1”Neither became a bonafide WR12020 Higgins WR#282021 Higgins WR#172022 Higgins WR#20Those aren’t “deal breaker” rankings for me.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 97 (members: 0, guests: 97)

Top 30 Visits 2025
- Latest: Voyageur
- 41 minutes ago
Draft Talk
The 80th Annual Amish Mafia Draft Contest
- Latest: Todd Princl
- Yesterday at 10:38 PM
Draft Talk
R
Dome over Lambeau?
- Latest: rmontro
- Yesterday at 10:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 Draft Clusters
- Latest: OldSchool101
- Yesterday at 9:26 PM
Draft Talk
Your Do Not Draft List
- Latest: Dantés
- Yesterday at 9:20 PM
Draft Talk