Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 785436" data-attributes="member: 7261">Funny thing is, considering what teams like the Texans paid for a QB like Brock Osweiler, or the Bears paid Mike Glennon (4 starts $18.5M), there always seems to be some QB hungry team out there willing to pay top dollar for the 3-5 year guys that have flashed just enough that there is hope he is the next up and coming star.  Foles is in his 7th year in the league, he has to be viewed as a bargain and might be a guy that the Eagles are more than happy to carry at $5.5M/year for insurance for as long as he can play.I would love to have a Nick Foles type of guy on the Packers.  Paying $4.5M more than Kizer costs isn't that much if it wins you some games.  It would be a good dilema to have, but even if Kizer improves a lot in the next 2 years, AR will probably still be playing and then all you can do is try and trade Kizer and start the whole process over of trying to find a backup or AR's eventual replacement.</blockquote>

Total: 94 (members: 5, guests: 89)