Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 785307" data-attributes="member: 7261">All I can assume with Boyle is that the Packers must see something special in the guy and they think other teams might see it too, or they wouldn't have used a roster spot for him.  I am with you Mondio, I never saw much, but I bow to the Packers and their decision making about Boyle.  However, I am still going to stick to my theory on the QB position.  A team should never carry 3 QB's on the 53, even more so when 2 of them are considered projects.  Especially when you have a team with Super Bowl aspirations and an offense that heavily relies on their QB.  I don't see much of a change in the Packers philosophy this year over last year, when the Packers season was derailed by having to play a very unproven QB for most of the year.  Had I been in Gute's shoes I would have signed a vet journeyman QB to back up #12 and then if I wanted to keep a project, Kizer becomes my #3.  I watched the Chiefs 2 vet backups (Henne and McGloin) basically shred the Packer backups, Kizer and Boyle didn't have much of that same success.  Henne will probably never be a Pro Bowler, but I would much rather see him on the Packer sidelines with a clipboard in 2018 than Kizer or Boyle.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 47 (members: 0, guests: 47)