Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 964771">My point was that a wealthy owner could easily bail out a team making an operational loss while the Packers would run into trouble covering up for it over an extended period.In addition those teams could pay significantly more money for coaches and executives, therefore you definitely don't want the Packers to be the team running up those salaries.Don't get me wrong, but $64M is peanuts for most NFL owners. For example, the Broncos were just bought for $4.65B!!!In addition the Packers can only use the money made in a stock sale on stadium improvements.While teams can only spend up to the cap on players teams with a wealthy owner are able to afford paying coaches and executives significantly more money.They can also spend huge bucks on the team's infrastructure as well.</blockquote>

Total: 153 (members: 5, guests: 148)