Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Solution to the Packers Offense
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 968427" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>Because of the Davante Adams saga, the wide receiver position has gotten virtually all of the attention as concerns the Green Bay offense. And certainly, his departure really matters and I would not argue otherwise. But, the Packers' offense is capable of succeeding without Adams on the team (and I believe it will). The solution isn't to add back in a talent like Davante. </p><p></p><p>It's health and execution on the offensive line. </p><p></p><p>Drive #2 (Punt) was ended by quick pressure and a sack as Za'Darius went right through Jake Hanson.</p><p></p><p>Drive #3 (Downs) was ended when Jonathan Bullard (a mere journeyman) reset the LOS against Hanson and stuffed A.J. Dillon.</p><p></p><p>Drive #5 (Interception) was ended when Harrison Phillips (again, a journeyman) went right through a Myers/Hanson double team, flushed Rodgers, and #12 decided to throw an ill-advised pass to Cobb while rolling left (not absolving Rodgers on that play, but it doesn't happen if there's protection). </p><p></p><p>Drive #7 (Fumble) was DOA when Za'Darius knifed right between Myers and Runyan immediately (they ended up blocking each other-- go watch).</p><p></p><p>That's in addition to drive #9 ending with a sack (more of the coverage variety, but Rodgers still didn't have a ton of time) and drive #10 ending on downs because of an incompletion when even if that pass had been caught, it would have been called back due to a penalty. </p><p></p><p>The point is this: the narrative on Sunday was "Look how many yards Adams has compared to the Packers' offense." That ain't it. The offense didn't function because the OL was not executing. </p><p></p><p>In a few weeks when the line is some combination of Bakhtiari, Jenkins, Myers, Runyan, and Nijman, things will look markedly different. They may look markedly different this Sunday if the guys on the field play a little bit better.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 968427, member: 12283"] Because of the Davante Adams saga, the wide receiver position has gotten virtually all of the attention as concerns the Green Bay offense. And certainly, his departure really matters and I would not argue otherwise. But, the Packers' offense is capable of succeeding without Adams on the team (and I believe it will). The solution isn't to add back in a talent like Davante. It's health and execution on the offensive line. Drive #2 (Punt) was ended by quick pressure and a sack as Za'Darius went right through Jake Hanson. Drive #3 (Downs) was ended when Jonathan Bullard (a mere journeyman) reset the LOS against Hanson and stuffed A.J. Dillon. Drive #5 (Interception) was ended when Harrison Phillips (again, a journeyman) went right through a Myers/Hanson double team, flushed Rodgers, and #12 decided to throw an ill-advised pass to Cobb while rolling left (not absolving Rodgers on that play, but it doesn't happen if there's protection). Drive #7 (Fumble) was DOA when Za'Darius knifed right between Myers and Runyan immediately (they ended up blocking each other-- go watch). That's in addition to drive #9 ending with a sack (more of the coverage variety, but Rodgers still didn't have a ton of time) and drive #10 ending on downs because of an incompletion when even if that pass had been caught, it would have been called back due to a penalty. The point is this: the narrative on Sunday was "Look how many yards Adams has compared to the Packers' offense." That ain't it. The offense didn't function because the OL was not executing. In a few weeks when the line is some combination of Bakhtiari, Jenkins, Myers, Runyan, and Nijman, things will look markedly different. They may look markedly different this Sunday if the guys on the field play a little bit better. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
ThePerfectBeard
tynimiller
Latest posts
S
Early 53 Man Roster Projection
Latest: Schultz
Today at 8:41 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Isaiah Simmons is COMING
Latest: McKnowledge
Today at 8:30 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
UDFA Signings 2025
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 6:50 PM
Draft Talk
Bucks 2024-25 Season Thread
Latest: weeds
Today at 6:27 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
M
Pick 87 Savion Williams WR TCU
Latest: mradtke66
Today at 4:30 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Solution to the Packers Offense
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
