Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1027249" data-attributes="member: 10086">I still think Dillon wasn’t properly exploited in the passing game. On small sample size he still performed good there. One of his biggest strengths was one of his biggest unknowns coming out of BC. Catching the ball. In addition, our OL was getting better towards seasons end, around the time Dillon was injured. He’s best suited as the RB2 in a 1-2 punch.Dillon enables us to get another finesse RB at RB2 to be Jones’ successor. Also have Dillon here 1 year to get that Rookie ramped up, plus act as a formidable contingency in event of an injury in the RB room. Dillon can comfortably elevate to our RB2 if either RB1/RB2 on the depth chart injure or miss time (I think we should draft a Top #88-125 RB Dillon could be an affordable piece of our Offense. I’ll also remind you that he plays better in cold weather. Which I’m fully expecting next January. His worst production season since being a Rookie was 2023, at 863 All Purpose and 2 TD across 15 contests. 4.7 career per touch and 4.8 career per touch in the Playoffs.  He also takes the focus off drafting 2 RB’s and he’s fully up to speed in our Offense.Imo. The slight drop in production is justification this season that he would be as our RB2/3 and that’s where the $$ should fall (2yr X ~$4.5-$6Mil offer)</blockquote>

Total: 230 (members: 5, guests: 225)