Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="shiftysdad" data-source="post: 46222" data-attributes="member: 426">okay... there could be a chance that maybe, just maybe, the ball grazed the white line, BUT there was no evidence, and when the reff called the touchdown was when Benny Boy pushed it over, when he was down.THATS my debate on it, so, the reff shouldn't have called it a touchdown in the firstplace... and ergo, when Pittsberg (would have) challenged it, there would have been no evidence FOR a touchdown.and i do respect Bettis, him and Polamalu (or whatever) are the two players on that team i like. althouh Bettis did nothing in that game (well, very little)oh, and the PI, it's funny how they noticed (i can't remember who) push the defender... but they neglected it when a Pittsberg player gave him a n ice little shove...and having a part of your body over does help in claiming it a touchdown... although not necesary... it's good evidence, but in Ben's case... not enough.and trust me, i am not a sore loser... i believe it is 5 years straight where the team i favoured did not win the superbowl (Patriots, Bucs, Patriots, Patriots, Pittsberg)and NONE of the other times have i claimed that there was a reffing problem (although the raiders did get their 2nd foot in the endzone [was that Rice? can't remember] against the bucs)</blockquote>

Total: 193 (members: 6, guests: 187)