Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 994181" data-attributes="member: 10086">It might surprise you that I actually agree with you in this. However teams can’t go around saying “we would’ve lost anyway”When you have several area’s of failure in an Offense that is causing problems.  I am in the firm opinion that the easiest and quickest deficiencies to fix are areas that conceivably have higher floors and higher ceilings. We boast a RB tandem in 2022 that is arguably top 5 in the NFL.  So if you’re having major issues in the passing game., Why in the world would you continue to force that aspect of game?Bills. 6.7 YPC, 31 carries. And it didn't matter, lost anyway.Maybe we wouldn’t have lost had we controlled the clock better and kept their Offense off the field!In the most recent NFC game, that 2022 SF49 Offense resembled the 2022 Packers season!Stalling left and right.Look at what the Eagles did to that clock! That 49ers D was totally and completely exhausted and defeated.What was the Eagles average per carry btw?  I think we can say average per does NOT tell the whole story. The Eagles literally played a game of keep away with 25 passes and 44 Runs. [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.espn.com/nfl/matchup/_/gameId/401438009[/URL]</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 98 (members: 0, guests: 98)

Badger Volleyball 2025-26
- Latest: Voyageur
- Today at 3:55 PM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
2025 Draft Clusters
- Latest: Dantés
- Today at 3:44 PM
Draft Talk
Top 30 Visits 2025
- Latest: DoURant
- Today at 3:38 PM
Draft Talk
S
A Packers Mock Draft
- Latest: Schultz
- Today at 12:39 PM
Draft Talk
R
Dome over Lambeau?
- Latest: rmontro
- Today at 3:47 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum