Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="tynimiller" data-source="post: 1000324" data-attributes="member: 6578">I just struggle with folks hardlining on both extremes...Capt says there was zero need in a declarative definitive manner - which is just false in numerous ways, even if it is just purely by the fact they may have very well saw a massively higher rated BPA drop to the position they did...that is something all GMs need to make happen when they do.Likewise those saying it was absolutely needed and what they should have done is also somewhat misguided IMO....Rodgers was not by the performance drop off cliff yet...statistical indicators illustrated potentially he was teetering towards it but a guy that "is" the franchise or as close to it as one can get you don't try and get cute with your timing of being early rather than late IMO. You draft to feed them till you for sure know he fell off the cliff of performance.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 134 (members: 1, guests: 133)

2025 Draft Prospects for Packers
- Latest: gopkrs
- Today at 4:17 PM
Draft Talk
Badger Volleyball 2025-26
- Latest: Pokerbrat2000
- Today at 4:09 PM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
Top 30 Visits 2025
- Latest: Pokerbrat2000
- Today at 3:58 PM
Draft Talk
Dome over Lambeau?
- Latest: Thirteen Below
- Today at 3:26 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Badgers Football
- Latest: Thirteen Below
- Today at 3:02 PM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum