Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Free Agency Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Favre&gt;Rodgers259" data-source="post: 773267" data-attributes="member: 10866"><p>I don't believe any team gets "stuck" with picking a player. They can trade back or simply reach for a position of need. At 14th Overall and this QB Centric Draft, we are far from stuck.</p><p></p><p>I know mocks are to be taken with a grain of salt, but I've never done a mock where Landry, Ward, Alexander, Vander Esch, or Vea weren't available at 14. We can definitely upgrade the defense at 14 with a quality player.</p><p></p><p>I also agree Davenport needs to go in the 2nd Round.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Ridley is a Top 10 pick because of how "weak" this WR class is. Last year, Ridley would have struggled to make the Top 25. I really hope he falls, because he will dictate how the run on WRs goes. The farther back he goes the better WR we can get in the 3rd or 4th. I'm also not against Gute trading back into the 1st to grab him after going defense at 14. If the Patriots miss out in Rosen they'd be a prime partner to look at.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Favre>Rodgers259, post: 773267, member: 10866"] I don't believe any team gets "stuck" with picking a player. They can trade back or simply reach for a position of need. At 14th Overall and this QB Centric Draft, we are far from stuck. I know mocks are to be taken with a grain of salt, but I've never done a mock where Landry, Ward, Alexander, Vander Esch, or Vea weren't available at 14. We can definitely upgrade the defense at 14 with a quality player. I also agree Davenport needs to go in the 2nd Round. Ridley is a Top 10 pick because of how "weak" this WR class is. Last year, Ridley would have struggled to make the Top 25. I really hope he falls, because he will dictate how the run on WRs goes. The farther back he goes the better WR we can get in the 3rd or 4th. I'm also not against Gute trading back into the 1st to grab him after going defense at 14. If the Patriots miss out in Rosen they'd be a prime partner to look at. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
R
Dome over Lambeau?
Latest: rmontro
39 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Badger Volleyball 2025-26
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 10:54 PM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
M
A Packers Mock Draft
Latest: Magooch
Yesterday at 10:34 PM
Draft Talk
2025 Draft Prospects for Packers
Latest: gopkrs
Yesterday at 4:17 PM
Draft Talk
Top 30 Visits 2025
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 3:58 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Free Agency Thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top