Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Aaron Rodgers performance thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mondio" data-source="post: 877656" data-attributes="member: 10441"><p>I think the Dillon pick could influence Jones negotiations to a degree, but I don’t think that pick was made to compete with Jones or replace Jones in the offense of that makes sense.</p><p></p><p>I see completely different backs that compliment each other in this offense more than anything.</p><p></p><p>I really believe we could have GBs version of Ingram and Kamara set up And ready to roll.</p><p></p><p>I think the pick was made because he was left on the board as someone they think can help this offense function more like the HC wants it to function more than it was to influence the Jones decision coming at years end.</p><p></p><p>If this team can legitimately line up on a 3rd and 3 or 4 and run pound the ball every time and get it? Man that’s going to open up everything else. Or consistently run on 1st and 2nd to get to 3rd and 1-2? Have Dillon and Jones on the field with jones staying backfield or motioning out?</p><p></p><p>Anyway, I’m just trying to say I believe they made the pick because he was who they identified as having the most impact for this offense left on the board more than anything else.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mondio, post: 877656, member: 10441"] I think the Dillon pick could influence Jones negotiations to a degree, but I don’t think that pick was made to compete with Jones or replace Jones in the offense of that makes sense. I see completely different backs that compliment each other in this offense more than anything. I really believe we could have GBs version of Ingram and Kamara set up And ready to roll. I think the pick was made because he was left on the board as someone they think can help this offense function more like the HC wants it to function more than it was to influence the Jones decision coming at years end. If this team can legitimately line up on a 3rd and 3 or 4 and run pound the ball every time and get it? Man that’s going to open up everything else. Or consistently run on 1st and 2nd to get to 3rd and 1-2? Have Dillon and Jones on the field with jones staying backfield or motioning out? Anyway, I’m just trying to say I believe they made the pick because he was who they identified as having the most impact for this offense left on the board more than anything else. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Half Empty
Latest posts
Packers Push to Ban the **** Push
Latest: OldSchool101
32 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The 80th Annual Amish Mafia Draft Contest
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 11:40 AM
Draft Talk
H
Bucks 2024-25 Season Thread
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 10:06 AM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
How much time?
Latest: El Guapo
Today at 10:03 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
New Proposed Kick-Off Rule
Latest: El Guapo
Today at 9:55 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Aaron Rodgers performance thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top