Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 978216" data-attributes="member: 12283">1) No-- I have always been consistent. PFF is a tool that I think can help form opinions; sometimes I agree and sometimes I disagree with what they're saying. You have always been the one to cite them as gospel, until now apparently.2) You're making a point that contradicts what you're trying to prove. The Falcons have considerably less talent than the Packers. They're finding more success because they're executing an offense that's being schemed and coached by a good offensive mind. Green Bay is back to the ********, static, predictable stuff they were doing before LaFleur arrived.3) What an inane statement. It's not speculation to notice that condensed formations, motions, under center, true play-action-- all hallmarks of LaFleur's offense-- have disappeared. Rodgers has literally said in public that he wanted some of these things to go away. As long as you're doing the whole "I am the voice of logic; awake every morning and find my fact checks on the forum" routine, you should try a little harder to notice what's actually happening. You crafting your own narrative our of whole cloth is bad for your brand.</blockquote>

Total: 121 (members: 8, guests: 113)