Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Studs n duds Cards
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sschind" data-source="post: 928228" data-attributes="member: 10247"><p>Next man up is fine if the next man has similar abilities but they are the next men for a reason. A different skill set might necessitate a change of game plan to best utilize them but that in itself can lessen the effectiveness of the offense. Honestly I didn't see much of the next man up last night. At least not on offense. I was hoping one of the young WRs would step up but I didn't really see it. Part of that is because MLF utilized a game plan that relied heavily on his remaining stalwarts (Jones, Dillon and Cobb) and the O line and defense, although filled with younger guys and guys maybe playing out of position for the most part had guys who had played a few games before. Besides that I do think many of the next men on defense did step up.</p><p></p><p>Bottom line next man up is the right attitude to have since there really is no other option. However, it is unrealistic to think these guys can come in and provide a level of play the starters have given. Its not an excuse its a fact.</p><p></p><p>This isn't so much a response to you Easy, just more of a comment on the next man up theory in general and how so many people just expect business as usual when the starters go down.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sschind, post: 928228, member: 10247"] Next man up is fine if the next man has similar abilities but they are the next men for a reason. A different skill set might necessitate a change of game plan to best utilize them but that in itself can lessen the effectiveness of the offense. Honestly I didn't see much of the next man up last night. At least not on offense. I was hoping one of the young WRs would step up but I didn't really see it. Part of that is because MLF utilized a game plan that relied heavily on his remaining stalwarts (Jones, Dillon and Cobb) and the O line and defense, although filled with younger guys and guys maybe playing out of position for the most part had guys who had played a few games before. Besides that I do think many of the next men on defense did step up. Bottom line next man up is the right attitude to have since there really is no other option. However, it is unrealistic to think these guys can come in and provide a level of play the starters have given. Its not an excuse its a fact. This isn't so much a response to you Easy, just more of a comment on the next man up theory in general and how so many people just expect business as usual when the starters go down. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
SudsMcBucky
PackerDNA
tynimiller
coulomb
DoURant
Snoops
Latest posts
2025 Draft Media Stuff
Latest: Dantés
4 minutes ago
Draft Talk
J
The 80th Annual Amish Mafia Draft Contest
Latest: JDPackers
28 minutes ago
Draft Talk
First Round Prospect Discussions Specifically
Latest: OldSchool101
28 minutes ago
Draft Talk
S
Green Bay to Host '25 Draft!
Latest: saturdaysarebetter
50 minutes ago
NFL Discussions
Dome over Lambeau?
Latest: milani
53 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Studs n duds Cards
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top