Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 884193" data-attributes="member: 12283">I would add to that first list that beyond just cooking up impressive game plans, that this system generally doesn't rely on WR talent nearly as heavily as our previous offense did. The basis of McCarthy's offense was to play out of 11 personnel with receivers who could consistently defeat single coverage. For it to be effective, you need WR's who are simply better than the opposition. LaFleur's offense is full of man-beaters that use condensed formations and pre-snap motion to scheme guys open. But of course you're right that stiffer defensive tests remain and that the receiving corps isn't as talented as it could be. This is in part because they didn't draft a WR, but also in part because of unforeseen circumstances, like Funchess bowing out and injuries. I still think that the WR corps is better than some people give it credit for. You can easily find good offenses with superior groups, but you can also find good offenses who aren't as talented. When at full strength, for instance, I would take the Packers WR's over the 49ers, the Ravens, and the Colts.</blockquote>

Total: 112 (members: 5, guests: 107)

A Packers Mock Draft
- Latest: SudsMcBucky
- Today at 8:26 AM
Draft Talk
Badger Volleyball 2025-26
- Latest: Pokerbrat2000
- Today at 7:56 AM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
R
Dome over Lambeau?
- Latest: rmontro
- Today at 3:47 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 Draft Prospects for Packers
- Latest: gopkrs
- Yesterday at 4:17 PM
Draft Talk
Top 30 Visits 2025
- Latest: Pokerbrat2000
- Yesterday at 3:58 PM
Draft Talk