Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="sschind" data-source="post: 670207" data-attributes="member: 10247"><p>It has a lot to do with strength of roster as well, both now and in the future.   Which would make a bigger contribution to the team having that 2nd full back or that 7th WR (just using WR as an example since so many people feel we are absolutely stacked and have 7 studs on our team.)  They obviously feel Ripkowski can do the job so it made Kuhn expendable and it freed up a roster spot for another player who may contribute more.  The year they kept 5 TEs someone else had to go. They obviously felt that 5th TE, whoever it was, was more valuable to the team than the last guy they cut.  In this case, for whatever reason, they felt Kuhn would not be one of the 53 most valuable players to have on the team.</p></blockquote><p></p>

No members online now.

Total: 96 (members: 0, guests: 96)

Good Bye J’aire Alexander
- Latest: gopkrs
- Yesterday at 7:45 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
How much time?
- Latest: PackerDNA
- Yesterday at 7:20 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Brewers 2025!
- Latest: weeds
- Yesterday at 6:45 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
First Round Prospect Discussions Specifically
- Latest: tynimiller
- Yesterday at 6:32 PM
Draft Talk
Your Do Not Draft List
- Latest: tynimiller
- Yesterday at 6:30 PM
Draft Talk