Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 906913" data-attributes="member: 7261">It is the trade that makes the most sense (for both teams and player) to me.<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Broncos need a QB and could be quite good with Rodgers.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Broncos are an AFC team</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Broncos have cap space</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Rodgers’ fiancée, Shailene Woodley lives in Boulder </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Rodgers names the Broncos as one of the teams he prefers</li> </ul>I don't buy the theory that the deal is already done or that the "Broncos drafted Surtain and he will go to the Packers in the deal. If that was the case, then Stokes was a luxury use of a first round pick.Will this deal get done?  If it is, I think the sooner the better, as well as the sooner, the more the Packers will get in the trade.I would have preferred picks in this years draft, simply because you know what they are.  If Rodgers vastly improves the Broncos, which I think he will, future picks will most likely be worth less.May be if they pull a deal off today, the Packers get a future #1 (or 2) and the Broncos #40 and/or #71 in this draft.</blockquote>

Total: 124 (members: 4, guests: 120)