Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="rmontro" data-source="post: 786836" data-attributes="member: 12340">It is if Kizer is the quarterback.I know a lot of people dislike the national media sports commentators, and I can understand that.  But once in awhile one of them says something thought provoking -  even a stopped clock is right twice a day remember.  Besides, bear in mind I don't live in Wisconsin so I don't have the luxury of getting all the home news.Cowherd said something the other day that still has me turning it over in my head, I don't know if he's full of it or if he's on to something.  He pointed out how Rodgers has had twice as many pro bowl offensive linemen than Brady has had, and yet Brady rarely gets sacked.  According to him, Brady audibles out of anything that's likely to bring him pressure, whereas Rodgers will rely on his scrambling ability to get himself out of danger.  This is likely one reason Brady's career has been extended like it has.Now I don't think it's so much about pro bowl linemen, as it is about your weakest lineman.  If one of them is a revolving door, you're in trouble.  But it makes me recall the early days in Rodgers career, how some were concerned that he might be injury prone.  That turned out not to be true, although he's clearly no Favre in that regard.  But now that he's getting older, it might become a concern again.</blockquote>

Total: 92 (members: 5, guests: 87)