Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rodgers Contract
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 778999"><p>That's not the option ever put on the table because teams do not fully guarantee contracts for good reason. It runs more along the lines of settling on the guaranteed money and then haggling over how much gets paid out now vs. later with some adjustments to the guarantee if necessary.</p><p></p><p>The realistic options are more like your 40% now vs. 45% in a combination now and later.</p><p></p><p>If you are arguing that contracts <strong>should be</strong> fully guaranteed on some <strong>principle</strong> and this silly signing bonus stuff <strong>should be</strong> dispensed with, it ain't gonna happen unless it is ensconsed in the next CBA. No such ensconsing will happen.</p><p></p><p>The negative implications for management of fully guaranteed contracts due to injury or performance decline under a hard cap are several and serious. It takes two to tango and management ain't dacing. </p><p></p><p>For now, today, given current realities, I gave you the Rodgers example where your principle is applied which takes the team over the cap in 2018 and seriously impairs the ability to refresh the roster in 2019. Full guarantees and opt outs are off the table.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 778999"] That's not the option ever put on the table because teams do not fully guarantee contracts for good reason. It runs more along the lines of settling on the guaranteed money and then haggling over how much gets paid out now vs. later with some adjustments to the guarantee if necessary. The realistic options are more like your 40% now vs. 45% in a combination now and later. If you are arguing that contracts [B]should be[/B] fully guaranteed on some [B]principle[/B] and this silly signing bonus stuff [B]should be[/B] dispensed with, it ain't gonna happen unless it is ensconsed in the next CBA. No such ensconsing will happen. The negative implications for management of fully guaranteed contracts due to injury or performance decline under a hard cap are several and serious. It takes two to tango and management ain't dacing. For now, today, given current realities, I gave you the Rodgers example where your principle is applied which takes the team over the cap in 2018 and seriously impairs the ability to refresh the roster in 2019. Full guarantees and opt outs are off the table. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
gopkrs
Pkrjones
Latest posts
Questions that Define the Draft (2025)
Latest: OldSchool101
23 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2025 Draft Clusters
Latest: DoURant
25 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Bucks 2024-25 Season Thread
Latest: DoURant
56 minutes ago
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
My Brush With Greatness
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 8:42 AM
NFL Discussions
H
Dome over Lambeau?
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 6:31 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rodgers Contract
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top