Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Heyjoe4" data-source="post: 916241" data-attributes="member: 13032">125/70 is just too much, as much as I like Adams and appreciate his skill set.  Even if he is the best WR in the NFL, and he probably is right now, especially with #12 throwing to him, that kind of deal can cripple a franchise financially and competitively.  And if Rodgers leaves, which seems likely, what good is it to have the best WR if the QB can't get the ball near him?  We're already seeing $45 mil/year for QBs (Mahomes).  How is a franchise supposed to build around that consistently?  I know the Chiefs are pulling it off, but for how long?  I'd rather see a competitive team every year that makes the occasional deep run.  And realistically, that's probably all we can ask for post-Rodgers.So I'd say no to Adams and work on getting the D into the top 5.  They aren't that far and plenty of teams have won with an elite D - Bucs, Seahags, Ravens, Steelers.  I'm probably missing a few.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 98 (members: 0, guests: 98)

2025 Draft Clusters
- Latest: OldSchool101
- 23 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Dome over Lambeau?
- Latest: Poppa San
- Today at 7:43 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
G
2025 Draft in Green Bay
- Latest: GreenBaySlacker
- Today at 7:29 PM
Draft Talk
Badger Volleyball 2025-26
- Latest: Voyageur
- Today at 3:55 PM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
Top 30 Visits 2025
- Latest: DoURant
- Today at 3:38 PM
Draft Talk