Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mondio" data-source="post: 816466" data-attributes="member: 10441">i don't think it's better at all, just more confusing.  Look at the muffed punt in the patriots game vs Packers Lions earlier this year with King?  I thought very similar and I thought what looked like "touching" in one angle was proven not to be in another.  To me, that should be a reason to make a call.  and in one game it was, the next it wasn't.  That will never go away.  It will never go away even if they get rid of replay.  People see things differently and everyone sees stuff incorrectly sometimes.That roughing call against KC, I was walking into the kitchen to get my late napping 2 year old something to eat.  Eyes glued to the TV though while walking in there and though for sure Brady got knocked right on the top of the helmet and said, "thats going to be a flag".  Came back to the living and sure enough, there was the flag and then they showed the replay, boy was I wrong. It happens.  This game will survive bad calls, it always has.  more replay equals more expectations and they're expectations that are completely unrealistic IMO.  and if you're not going to replay everything, why replay somethings?  because if it's only somethings, something else will be missed in a big moment.  more eyes, more interpretations, more errors IMO.  Get officials in the game and let them call it.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 78 (members: 1, guests: 77)