Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Refereeing in Playoff Games
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mondio" data-source="post: 816452" data-attributes="member: 10441"><p>and this is why I'd rather they just do away with it. It's like Philly play from earlier this year. I don't remember all the specifics, but a fumble I believe and there were 3 or 4 philly guys right there, an arm came out and pulled the ball in, which you could see and then an ensuing pile of bodies. as they undid the pile, from the bottom was all Philly players and they guy that pulled it in to begin with came out with it. Besides that, there was literally zero dallas players in position to have recovered the ball. But since there was a pile of Philly players there was no "clear" recovery and thus it stayed with Dallas. </p><p></p><p>and that's one where everybody on earth could see it was Philly ball, but it didn't fit the rule to overturn. and then you have a play like this, where some think maybe, some think clearly, some think stands, overturn. Ask any mouth attached to 2 eyes and you're going to get quite a mix of what they "think". Then toss in ever changing language and more rules and this is becoming an impossibly tough game to officiate. There were so many plays this year where I felt what good is replay for anyway after they upheld or overturned some things. and here we have another play, so many people see something different how can it ever be "right"?</p><p></p><p>I know people think we have the technology to make it right and I disagree completely. Sure a better view on some might help, but then I don't want this game officiated at slow motion. Analyze after the fact, fine. I think the game will obviously survive bad call, as it has since its inception. I don't know if it will survive microanalyzing every play every game. Train your officials, simplify some rules and get it going. Officiating the game should never be taken from the officials on the field. There are feels, and flows to game and the officials are there to call it that way. Let them, and if they're not doing a good enough job, replace them. But let them be officials and let the games go on.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mondio, post: 816452, member: 10441"] and this is why I'd rather they just do away with it. It's like Philly play from earlier this year. I don't remember all the specifics, but a fumble I believe and there were 3 or 4 philly guys right there, an arm came out and pulled the ball in, which you could see and then an ensuing pile of bodies. as they undid the pile, from the bottom was all Philly players and they guy that pulled it in to begin with came out with it. Besides that, there was literally zero dallas players in position to have recovered the ball. But since there was a pile of Philly players there was no "clear" recovery and thus it stayed with Dallas. and that's one where everybody on earth could see it was Philly ball, but it didn't fit the rule to overturn. and then you have a play like this, where some think maybe, some think clearly, some think stands, overturn. Ask any mouth attached to 2 eyes and you're going to get quite a mix of what they "think". Then toss in ever changing language and more rules and this is becoming an impossibly tough game to officiate. There were so many plays this year where I felt what good is replay for anyway after they upheld or overturned some things. and here we have another play, so many people see something different how can it ever be "right"? I know people think we have the technology to make it right and I disagree completely. Sure a better view on some might help, but then I don't want this game officiated at slow motion. Analyze after the fact, fine. I think the game will obviously survive bad call, as it has since its inception. I don't know if it will survive microanalyzing every play every game. Train your officials, simplify some rules and get it going. Officiating the game should never be taken from the officials on the field. There are feels, and flows to game and the officials are there to call it that way. Let them, and if they're not doing a good enough job, replace them. But let them be officials and let the games go on. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
S
How much time?
Latest: Schultz
Today at 12:01 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
First Round Prospect Discussions Specifically
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 11:08 PM
Draft Talk
New Proposed Kick-Off Rule
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 9:49 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2023 round 3 pick #78: Tucker Kraft TE
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 9:29 PM
Draft Talk
Who Plans on Attending the Draft?
Latest: Wi. Mike now in Florida
Yesterday at 8:18 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Refereeing in Playoff Games
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top