Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Refereeing in Playoff Games
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sschind" data-source="post: 816180" data-attributes="member: 10247"><p>Two points. #1 I think they got the Edleman call right. It appears you disagree. Don't bother trying to convince me otherwise. I watched the play 25 times from 5 different angles and I didn't see the ball touch him anywhere. believe me I wanted the Patriots to lose as much as anyone so i was looking for anything to convince me he touched it..</p><p></p><p>#2 On the fail Mary that play was going to be reviewed either way. It was a score or a turnover and both are reviewable (at least now they are) You may think they got it wrong on review, and every Packer fan in the world might think they got it wrong but there are plenty of people who think they got it right. Lets change the situation a little bit. Lets give them a few more seconds and move it from the endzone to the 1 yard line and the Seahawks call a timeout with 1 second left. The refs rule complete McCarthy thinks its an interception but has used his challenges or has no timeouts left (McCarthy used all his timeouts...I know sounds incredible doesn't it). Anyway, the Seahakws run another play and score and win. Its the same play but because it is not reviewable teh Packers lose out. If he is deemed wrong, in this case additional yards may not be a big enough deterrent so you add 10 seconds onto the clock. Enough for the Seahawks to get an extra play if the first one doesn't work.</p><p></p><p>Like my previous post I am simply saying that we have the technology to get he call right. On subjective calls (Like one of Clay's roughing the passer calls from earlier in the year) I don't really care if the call is upheld I just think coaches should have the ability to challenge if they think it is worth the risk.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sschind, post: 816180, member: 10247"] Two points. #1 I think they got the Edleman call right. It appears you disagree. Don't bother trying to convince me otherwise. I watched the play 25 times from 5 different angles and I didn't see the ball touch him anywhere. believe me I wanted the Patriots to lose as much as anyone so i was looking for anything to convince me he touched it.. #2 On the fail Mary that play was going to be reviewed either way. It was a score or a turnover and both are reviewable (at least now they are) You may think they got it wrong on review, and every Packer fan in the world might think they got it wrong but there are plenty of people who think they got it right. Lets change the situation a little bit. Lets give them a few more seconds and move it from the endzone to the 1 yard line and the Seahawks call a timeout with 1 second left. The refs rule complete McCarthy thinks its an interception but has used his challenges or has no timeouts left (McCarthy used all his timeouts...I know sounds incredible doesn't it). Anyway, the Seahakws run another play and score and win. Its the same play but because it is not reviewable teh Packers lose out. If he is deemed wrong, in this case additional yards may not be a big enough deterrent so you add 10 seconds onto the clock. Enough for the Seahawks to get an extra play if the first one doesn't work. Like my previous post I am simply saying that we have the technology to get he call right. On subjective calls (Like one of Clay's roughing the passer calls from earlier in the year) I don't really care if the call is upheld I just think coaches should have the ability to challenge if they think it is worth the risk. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Bucks 2024-25 Season Thread
Latest: Voyageur
A moment ago
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
S
How much time?
Latest: Schultz
Today at 12:01 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
First Round Prospect Discussions Specifically
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 11:08 PM
Draft Talk
New Proposed Kick-Off Rule
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 9:49 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2023 round 3 pick #78: Tucker Kraft TE
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 9:29 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Refereeing in Playoff Games
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top