Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rebuild a new LaFleur offense or get what Pettine needs on defense?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GleefulGary" data-source="post: 816964" data-attributes="member: 12583"><p>Drafting a RB at the end of Rd 1 is different than in the early first.</p><p></p><p>Here's how I look at it:</p><p></p><p>I would take an OT early and often. I would've drafted Q. Nelson at any time last year. I love OL. They're a necessity for a good team. </p><p></p><p>I think in this particular draft, there are some OT's worthy of being drafted at 12. I don't think there are any RB's worth it. I don't think there are any WR's worth it. There might be a couple edges, there might be some iDL available that are worth it. That's the strength of this draft at the upper end, imo. I wouldn't pass on one of them to reach for a WR/RB. Where NE drafted Michel, he was arguably the top talent available. So that's fine! I just don't see a RB/WR where we are drafting at 12 that we could say that about.</p><p></p><p>Every drafts talents are different. Some heavy on offensive skills positions, some aren't. I personally think that in general, the best value for WR's is rds 2-4. Just my opion. Doesn't mean I wouldn't take a WR round 1, I just wouldn't where we are at 12. I would at 30 if the right guy is there. Just depends on the board.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GleefulGary, post: 816964, member: 12583"] Drafting a RB at the end of Rd 1 is different than in the early first. Here's how I look at it: I would take an OT early and often. I would've drafted Q. Nelson at any time last year. I love OL. They're a necessity for a good team. I think in this particular draft, there are some OT's worthy of being drafted at 12. I don't think there are any RB's worth it. I don't think there are any WR's worth it. There might be a couple edges, there might be some iDL available that are worth it. That's the strength of this draft at the upper end, imo. I wouldn't pass on one of them to reach for a WR/RB. Where NE drafted Michel, he was arguably the top talent available. So that's fine! I just don't see a RB/WR where we are drafting at 12 that we could say that about. Every drafts talents are different. Some heavy on offensive skills positions, some aren't. I personally think that in general, the best value for WR's is rds 2-4. Just my opion. Doesn't mean I wouldn't take a WR round 1, I just wouldn't where we are at 12. I would at 30 if the right guy is there. Just depends on the board. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
How much time?
Latest: OldSchool101
16 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
New Proposed Kick-Off Rule
Latest: OldSchool101
52 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2023 round 3 pick #78: Tucker Kraft TE
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:29 PM
Draft Talk
Who Plans on Attending the Draft?
Latest: Wi. Mike now in Florida
Today at 8:18 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 NFL Free Agency
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 5:56 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rebuild a new LaFleur offense or get what Pettine needs on defense?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top