Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rebuild a new LaFleur offense or get what Pettine needs on defense?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 816931" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>And I respect that Mondio. We’re in agreement on OL. Im not as comfortable as you on Offense. We were largely disfunctional in the passing game compared to recent past years and our ceiling. Some of that was due to AR having a down year, some of that was injury related but much of it was rookies running around not knowing their assignment. They didnt have the experience to work the sideline and come back to the ball when Rodgers bought plenty of time. I believe even the casual spectator saw that.</p><p></p><p> We also lack a true tandem of RBs. WilliAms is a solid #3 and that’s not a slight on him, it takes a huge amount of talent and work to be s backup in this league. He’s a very good blocker also. But that said, we could use a multi dimensional RB that’s a threat in the short game. We tried to develop Eddie Lacy there but he had limitations and never fully grasped much past 2-3 yard dump passes and screens. He was a 10 gauge shotgun deluxe model with limited rounds, we need a 12 gauge with 8 in the chamber of versatility.</p><p></p><p>What I’m saying is this.. This O needs more than a solid O lineman or 2. We need the shield but we also need a few weapons to work with. We’re missing a piece or 2 and a couple of “dangerous” playmakers could open this O up. RB or WR idc. I’m not in the camp of so much GB pride that I can’t see our weaknesses. If we go in to 2019 without injecting more playmakers were in legitimate trouble of wasting another year of Rodgers prime. Hell we might already be past his prime, let’s start surrounding him with something better than 5th round rookies, his legs aren’t what they used to be.</p><p></p><p>PS. Please don’t take away the genius designation I appreciate it it’s the best compliment I’ve had in awhile and I thank you for it. I pray you’ll see one day that Differences in opinion don’t mean that we’re not smart or that we don’t love the game of football with the same passion or that it’s some attack on our fellow Packer brothers n sisters. I respect your viewpoint you sound intelligent, so Im gambling that you hear some truth in all of this. Who knows, I’ve changed my opinion before after debating topics it wouldn’t be the first time.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 816931, member: 10086"] And I respect that Mondio. We’re in agreement on OL. Im not as comfortable as you on Offense. We were largely disfunctional in the passing game compared to recent past years and our ceiling. Some of that was due to AR having a down year, some of that was injury related but much of it was rookies running around not knowing their assignment. They didnt have the experience to work the sideline and come back to the ball when Rodgers bought plenty of time. I believe even the casual spectator saw that. We also lack a true tandem of RBs. WilliAms is a solid #3 and that’s not a slight on him, it takes a huge amount of talent and work to be s backup in this league. He’s a very good blocker also. But that said, we could use a multi dimensional RB that’s a threat in the short game. We tried to develop Eddie Lacy there but he had limitations and never fully grasped much past 2-3 yard dump passes and screens. He was a 10 gauge shotgun deluxe model with limited rounds, we need a 12 gauge with 8 in the chamber of versatility. What I’m saying is this.. This O needs more than a solid O lineman or 2. We need the shield but we also need a few weapons to work with. We’re missing a piece or 2 and a couple of “dangerous” playmakers could open this O up. RB or WR idc. I’m not in the camp of so much GB pride that I can’t see our weaknesses. If we go in to 2019 without injecting more playmakers were in legitimate trouble of wasting another year of Rodgers prime. Hell we might already be past his prime, let’s start surrounding him with something better than 5th round rookies, his legs aren’t what they used to be. PS. Please don’t take away the genius designation I appreciate it it’s the best compliment I’ve had in awhile and I thank you for it. I pray you’ll see one day that Differences in opinion don’t mean that we’re not smart or that we don’t love the game of football with the same passion or that it’s some attack on our fellow Packer brothers n sisters. I respect your viewpoint you sound intelligent, so Im gambling that you hear some truth in all of this. Who knows, I’ve changed my opinion before after debating topics it wouldn’t be the first time. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Pkrjones
Latest posts
2025 NFL Free Agency
Latest: tynimiller
38 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2023 round 3 pick #78: Tucker Kraft TE
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 4:17 PM
Draft Talk
H
How much time?
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 3:15 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Bucks 2024-25 Season Thread
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 3:00 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
S
2025 Roster - Semi Live Thread
Latest: Schultz
Today at 1:29 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rebuild a new LaFleur offense or get what Pettine needs on defense?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
