Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Projecting the Offense
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 964305"><p>While there's some truth to it the Packers had enough time before the start of the season to prepare for Nelson's loss after he was injured in a preaseason game in Pittsburgh.</p><p></p><p>Even with Rodgers coming off an MVP season at that point as well they weren't able to make up for it all season long though.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's a fact that the Packers don't have any receiver currently on the roster who put up numbers like Cobb and Jones in 2014.</p><p></p><p>It's possible the offense will still perform well but there's no doubt the receiving corps is a huge question mark entering the season. A bigger one that it has ever been before since Rodgers became the starter in 2008.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Once again, take a look at his numbers in 2015 to at lease acknowdlege that even Rodgers can't perform at an MVP level without some talent at wide receiver.</p><p></p><p>I agree the receiving corps has potential but that doesn't automatically result in a decent performance on the field.</p><p></p><p>Let's take a look at the receiving corps of some other contenders around the league:</p><p></p><p>Bills: Diggs, Davis, Crowder</p><p>Bucs: Evans, Godwin, Jones</p><p>Chiefs: Hardman, Smith-Schuster, MVS</p><p>Rams: Kupp, Robinson, Jefferson</p><p></p><p>Considering the Chiefs have Kelce at tight end and the Bills have a talented one in Knox as well there's absolutely no way anyone should prefer having the Packers' receiving corps over any of those teams listed.</p><p></p><p>I don't care that they might have more talent than a team like the Bears at the position as they won't be a team to compete with for a Super Bowl.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You're completely exaggerating if you truly believe I act like the Packers are a dysfunctional franchise.</p><p></p><p>With that being said, taking a look at the offensive line, wide receivers and tight ends there's definitely reason to be concerned for a Super Bowl contender.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 6794, post: 964305"] While there's some truth to it the Packers had enough time before the start of the season to prepare for Nelson's loss after he was injured in a preaseason game in Pittsburgh. Even with Rodgers coming off an MVP season at that point as well they weren't able to make up for it all season long though. It's a fact that the Packers don't have any receiver currently on the roster who put up numbers like Cobb and Jones in 2014. It's possible the offense will still perform well but there's no doubt the receiving corps is a huge question mark entering the season. A bigger one that it has ever been before since Rodgers became the starter in 2008. Once again, take a look at his numbers in 2015 to at lease acknowdlege that even Rodgers can't perform at an MVP level without some talent at wide receiver. I agree the receiving corps has potential but that doesn't automatically result in a decent performance on the field. Let's take a look at the receiving corps of some other contenders around the league: Bills: Diggs, Davis, Crowder Bucs: Evans, Godwin, Jones Chiefs: Hardman, Smith-Schuster, MVS Rams: Kupp, Robinson, Jefferson Considering the Chiefs have Kelce at tight end and the Bills have a talented one in Knox as well there's absolutely no way anyone should prefer having the Packers' receiving corps over any of those teams listed. I don't care that they might have more talent than a team like the Bears at the position as they won't be a team to compete with for a Super Bowl. You're completely exaggerating if you truly believe I act like the Packers are a dysfunctional franchise. With that being said, taking a look at the offensive line, wide receivers and tight ends there's definitely reason to be concerned for a Super Bowl contender. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
gopkrs
Latest posts
State of our former QB, Aaron Rodgers
Latest: gopkrs
5 minutes ago
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
First Round Prospect Discussions Specifically
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 11:34 PM
Draft Talk
2025 Draft in Green Bay
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 11:16 PM
Draft Talk
S
Who Plans on Attending the Draft?
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 8:35 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Lazard Situation...
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 8:18 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Projecting the Offense
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
