Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Profootball talks says favre is returning
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Anubis" data-source="post: 56160" data-attributes="member: 257"><p>Taking another QB in the first round at #5 only to trade him later makes absolutely no sense to me. If another team wants Leinart or Young and they are still available when the Pack's turn comes up, they will make a deal with them at that time. Otherwise, we have a top 5 pick of ANYONE out of the draft in the first round. Considering the holes we need to fill, I think that TT should concentrate on filling them with positions we need, rather than wasting a 1st round pick on someone we don't.</p><p></p><p>Leinart (or Young) may develop into a better QB than A-Rod, but unless you can predict the future, we have no idea how ANY of them will make out in the NFL. To repeat for the 100th time, A-Rod has yet to start in a regular season NFL game. Until he is given a chance, I hope TT will concentrate on drafting other potential playmakers to fill the holes we have on both offense AND defense (corners, O-line, receivers, etc.).</p><p></p><p>I wonder what would happen if we drafted Leinart AND Favre decided to give it another go. Will you (once again) be discussing drafting a QB to replace Favre for the 3rd straight pre-season? </p><p></p><p>GO PACK!!!</p><p></p><p>Robert C. Hedley</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Anubis, post: 56160, member: 257"] Taking another QB in the first round at #5 only to trade him later makes absolutely no sense to me. If another team wants Leinart or Young and they are still available when the Pack's turn comes up, they will make a deal with them at that time. Otherwise, we have a top 5 pick of ANYONE out of the draft in the first round. Considering the holes we need to fill, I think that TT should concentrate on filling them with positions we need, rather than wasting a 1st round pick on someone we don't. Leinart (or Young) may develop into a better QB than A-Rod, but unless you can predict the future, we have no idea how ANY of them will make out in the NFL. To repeat for the 100th time, A-Rod has yet to start in a regular season NFL game. Until he is given a chance, I hope TT will concentrate on drafting other potential playmakers to fill the holes we have on both offense AND defense (corners, O-line, receivers, etc.). I wonder what would happen if we drafted Leinart AND Favre decided to give it another go. Will you (once again) be discussing drafting a QB to replace Favre for the 3rd straight pre-season? GO PACK!!! Robert C. Hedley [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
S
2025 Packer Free Agent News/Tracker
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 10:16 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Roster Assessment, 2025 Off-Season
Latest: Dantés
Yesterday at 7:30 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 NFL Free Agency
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 7:22 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
CB Nate Hobbs Signed In FA 2025
Latest: gopkrs
Yesterday at 6:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
M
Good Bye J’aire Alexander
Latest: mradtke66
Yesterday at 5:24 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Profootball talks says favre is returning
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top