Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Prioritizing Needs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 995204"><p>Don't get me wrong, I don't want the Packers to reach for safety in the draft just for the sake of selecting one. In my opinion they will need to improve the talent level at the position somehow to feature a decent defense though. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The Packers could offer Love a long term deal as soon as he shows some promise as a starter. If he does, both the fifth year option or the franchise tag would guarantee they have enough time to sign him to an extension but I wouldn't expect him to play under either of them. So the tag costing significantly more doesn't make a difference in my opinion. The team not picking up his fifth year option makes sure they don't owe him more than $20 million if he doesn't develop into a decent starter though.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I believe the Giants made a huge mistake signing Jones to a deal like that but picking up his fifth year option last year wouldn't have made any difference in him asking for that kind of money.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As mentioned above, if Love proves to be a decent starter I don't expect him to play on the fifth year option in 2024 anyway.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 6794, post: 995204"] Don't get me wrong, I don't want the Packers to reach for safety in the draft just for the sake of selecting one. In my opinion they will need to improve the talent level at the position somehow to feature a decent defense though. The Packers could offer Love a long term deal as soon as he shows some promise as a starter. If he does, both the fifth year option or the franchise tag would guarantee they have enough time to sign him to an extension but I wouldn't expect him to play under either of them. So the tag costing significantly more doesn't make a difference in my opinion. The team not picking up his fifth year option makes sure they don't owe him more than $20 million if he doesn't develop into a decent starter though. I believe the Giants made a huge mistake signing Jones to a deal like that but picking up his fifth year option last year wouldn't have made any difference in him asking for that kind of money. As mentioned above, if Love proves to be a decent starter I don't expect him to play on the fifth year option in 2024 anyway. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
gopkrs
BMKoenig
Latest posts
S
2025 Packer Free Agent News/Tracker
Latest: Schultz
34 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Roster Assessment, 2025 Off-Season
Latest: Dantés
Today at 7:30 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 NFL Free Agency
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 7:22 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
CB Nate Hobbs Signed In FA 2025
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 6:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
M
Good Bye J’aire Alexander
Latest: mradtke66
Today at 5:24 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Prioritizing Needs
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top