Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 995133" data-attributes="member: 10086">Looking back across multiples drafts, GB was thinking that their QB play could largely carry the Offense. Thus with that in mind the Packers drafted to put a Defense in place that would compliment Rodger’s Offense.  However a combination of consistently below average Defensive Coaching and Direction along with selecting players that never really exceeded expectation never brought the plan to fruition.That said. It’s totally reasonable to expect that with a major change at QB to a inexperienced one, that the Packers would draft heavier initially on Offense. In consideration of that argument, I agree that its very reasonable to assume GB would get at bare minimum ONE 2nd Rounder in a trade deal. So using that obvious trade equity projection, I could absolutely see GB going after 3 of those choices by our #116 selection. My guess is we will go WR, TE and OT inside those first 5 picks (not necessarily in order) It’s probable that GB either selects an Offensive player at #15 OR uses 3 of the next 4 selections (42,45,79,116)on Offensive upgrades.</blockquote>

Total: 113 (members: 2, guests: 111)